Talk:List of rotoscoped works

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Animation Mid‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

This list may be belong to more projects than Films. Hoverfish Talk 20:01, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure Fell in Love with a Girl by The White Stripes is rotoscope?

Unreferenced[edit]

This article doesn't have any references. Entries need to have some kind of link verifying that the work in question was, in fact, rotoscoped. Otherwise, they must be progressively removed. --Eyrian 17:09, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You want everything referenced? How about going to IMDb and looking for "rotoscope" credits and "rotoscope artists" in the credits? I can add links to these pages but it seems a bit pointless as a lot of articles actually mention that they are rotoscoped or contain rotoscoped scenes. Tartan 22:58, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's not really the big films I'm concerned about, it's the smaller stuff. --Eyrian 01:01, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Imdb is not a reliable source, and external links are also not an acceptable way to include references in any case. ~T P W 16:39, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This article is awful. A huge number of the films listed were not rotoscoped. Here's an article explaining the difference between rotoscope and reference, which is what a lot of these films have: Rotoscope vs. Reference. It does cite Thumbelina, as well as mentioning Gulliver's Travels and Lord of the Rings. But I am removing a few films from the list (including Princess and the Frog despite it's citation; again, the citation is NOT talking about rotoscoping). 66.214.242.147 (talk) 02:31, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I also removed Beowulf and Polar Express, being that they are motion capture. Motion capture is also not rotoscope. Honestly, I think this article should be deleted and started from scratch. 66.214.242.147 (talk) 02:35, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of rotoscoped works. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150504030329/http://www.jdeutrom.com/essays/10/ to http://www.jdeutrom.com/essays/10/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:12, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can geometry + motion capture be considered 3D equivalent of rotoscoping?[edit]

The short film A Computer Animated Hand was made using 3D geometry and motion capture which i see it as a 3D equivalent of rotoscoping. Should it be added to the list? 94.180.48.0 (talk) 09:58, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]