This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
The picture was categorised under meta as a boarding home or similar, which I would think is the correct image - if any - to use for this case. If there's a clearer or better picture though that'd be good. RichsLaw (talk) 23:17, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
It would be very unusual for the article to feature a picture of an unrelated hotel (Asserbohus), instead of a picture of Axeholme House itself. I'd say it's probably best to do without a picture in this case, because the case isn't really even about boarding houses in general. TheFeds 00:18, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Generally UK case law articles tend to feature a picture related to the case; upon reflection it's probably better to do without one unless one of Axeholme House turns up, though I'd disagree boarding houses aren't a central point of this case. RichsLaw (talk) 10:35, 14 July 2009 (UTC)