Talk:Liu Xianbin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Biography (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 
WikiProject Human rights (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Editorializing against Liu Xianbin[edit]

Untitled[edit]

The article should probably report the court report in detail, but the article almost appears to endorse it - this needs to be changed.BinSchmidt (talk) 10:53, 28 March 2011 (UTC) I've deleted the following text:

Liu's "rumors and slanders" against the Chinese Communist Party and the PRC government found in recent articles:[1]
  • "The rule of the Communist Party has always been characterized by high pressure and terror",
  • "The Communist Party authorities "rely on naked violence",
  • The evening news television broadcast is "an important tongue of the authorities for idiotizing the people",
  • The Chinese people live under "the terrorizing rule of the political police", and "live their lives mechanically like slaves", and
  • "The officials of the Chinese authorities I have actually had contact with have all been playing the role of accomplices to the inhumane state apparatus".

The information should probably be included somehow, if it was from the Indictment, as the link suggests, but in this format it almost looks like wikipedia is endorsing the view that these are in fact "rumors and slanders", which violates NPOV.BinSchmidt (talk) 11:00, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

I agree completely. I'll start working on improving this.. L talk 05:47, 5 July 2011 (UTC)