Talk:Long-beaked echidna

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Mammals / Monotremes and Marsupials  (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Monotremes and Marsupials.
 

Untitled[edit]

Can anyone add a picture? Thanks.--68.90.62.100 21:23, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

A thirty meter echidna...[edit]

In regards to the zaglossus hacketti: "Remarks: This species is known only from a few bones. At 30 metres long, it was huge for an echidna and for monotremes in general."

I think that pretty much speaks for itself. Anyone know how large those were actually supposed to be? I've read "sheep-sized" somewhere, but I'm not sure. --Matt S. 17:15, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

One meter is correct, 30 is not. It was some vandalism that didn' get revert awhile back. - UtherSRG (talk) 10:49, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Long-beaked echidna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:25, 5 January 2018 (UTC)