Talk:Louise Bryant

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


The 1900 Census for Nevada states that she was born in December 1886 not 1885. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stutzey (talkcontribs) 19:45, 10 February 2009 (UTC)


I have done some cleanup on the recent editing, which is a nice addition. However, a number of mildly controversial or racy details (sexual stuff, criticism, etc.) were omitted during that editing. I encourage anyone concerned about these lost passages to explore and reintroduce any that may be deemed important or worthwhile. Richard Myers (talk) 22:05, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
This review is transcluded from Talk:Louise Bryant/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Rosiestep (talk · contribs) 04:16, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

I'll review this one within a week. --Rosiestep (talk) 04:16, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Super! Thank you. Finetooth (talk) 19:30, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
  • wls: Russian Revolution, Senate, Nevada, University of Nevada in Reno, University of Oregon
Early life
  • wl: stump speaker, Puget Sound
  • delink UNR
  • If the name of the sorority is mentioned in some ref, please name it
Greenwich Village and Cape Cod
  • "an established journalist" - the previous section already described him as an "established writer "
  • Mary Heaton Vorse - first mention should be full name, but she can be referred to as surname thereafter
  • Sara Bard Field - first mention should be full name, but she can be referred to by surname thereafter
  • "Bryant wrote to a note to..." - Bryant wrote in a note to
New York
  • wl: October Revolution
Death and legacy
  • Jan. - spell out as January
  • wl: Yale University
  • "in Sterling Memorial Library" - in the Sterling Memorial Library
See also
  • unnecessary as the Communist Party of the United States and Eugene O'Neill are mentioned in the article
  • I don't think the one of Benito Mussolini is necessary, but it's only my opinion and not a suggestion

Few recommendations; well-written article. I'll put in on hold for the usual 7 days in case you're busy with other things. Please ping me when you're done. --Rosiestep (talk) 03:38, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

@Rosiestep: I believe I've made all the changes you recommended plus a couple of others along the way. Please poke me up if you see anything else amiss. Finetooth (talk) 20:04, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Good job. Looks adequate for GA. --Rosiestep (talk) 03:02, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much for taking the time and trouble to review this article. Finetooth (talk) 03:22, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.