Talk:Love Is Blindness

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Love Is Blindness has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
October 15, 2011 Good article nominee Listed

Find sources: "Love Is Blindness" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference

Song capitalization[edit]

The correct capitalization is "Love Is Blindness, according to WP standards at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Music/MUSTARD#Capitalization, which reads, "Capitalize every [...] verb (including the verb to be)..."Crashintome4196 00:18, 14 December 2006 (UTC)


I added some detail about how the song was played live, and they are no longer here. They are definitely relevant, as this is the song's page, and they were notable details about the changes from the album version. As the page for this songs, significant details should be counted as relevant. Phillies26 21:54, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

If no one objects, I am reverting it back to my original edit on the basis of it being notable information about the restructuring of the song live. Phillies26 19:57, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

No objections here MelicansMatkin 20:12, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Love Is Blindness/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Lemurbaby (talk · contribs) 14:44, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:


  • Great work, U2 editors. Lemurbaby (talk) 14:50, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the review! Melicans (talk, contributions) 15:12, 15 October 2011 (UTC)