Talk:Lucene

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Java (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Java, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Java on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Computing (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

--Rkthorne 03:10, 6 September 2005 (UTC) Have updated the latest Lucene implementations.


Untitled[edit]

Removed link to Lupy project since it has been retired [1] Open2universe 04:59, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

PHP port[edit]

Andi Gutman (responsible for PHP 3, and some other PHP stuff afterward) noted that there is now a Lucene port to PHP at the recent Scale4x Linux conference.

Ported vs bindings[edit]

I don't know the product, but I think it was not ported to so many different programming languages. I expect it to have bindings for those languages? I have the same feeling. Notably, I did not find a native C++ implementation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.180.228.22 (talk) 10:49, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

  At least the PHP port is definitely a stand alone implementation. It uses the same index format, but runs without using any Java code.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.253.47.226 (talk) 09:57, 24 February 2009 (UTC) 

How Indexing Done In Lucene[edit]

How Indexing Takes Place In Lucene

How to index images of text pages[edit]

Which one is better for indexing scanned text jLibrary, solr or nutch we currently using Lucene — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.173.72.124 (talk) 06:14, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Lucene -> Lucene Java[edit]

Nowaday, it seems like Lucene become boarder than Lucene Java? [2] 158.108.135.144 05:15, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

"Lucene" is the name of the Apache Top Level Project (TLP) which serves as an umbrella for dealing with all search related apache subprojects -- including "Lucene-Java", a java search library used as the foundation for some of the other sub projects (Nutch and Solr) and the reference implementation for some of the "port" subprojects (Lucene.Net and the now defunct Lucene4c). Some subprojects however have no direct relationship to the "Lucene Java" library, but are still included in the Lucene TLP because they are search related and share common goals and communities (Hadoop and Lucy)
In a broad discussion/context of user communities or Apache projects the term "Lucene" refers to the TLP and "Lucene-Java" (or "Java Lucene") refers to the specific sub project. Within the Lucene community (or any of the sub communities), "Lucene" is frequently used to refer to the Lucene-Java project/product as long as the context is clear.
--hossman 05:10, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Performance[edit]

Java versus C#: Since the code is so similar, comparing the performance on the different virtual machines would make for a very interesting comparison between Java and C#.

Has anyone done such a study? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.7.147.153 (talk) 20:06, 9 May 2007 (UTC).

Wikipedia standards[edit]

I don't think this article answers the "What is it?" question in the first (or second) sentence. It does not happen before in the second section, "Features and common use":

"... full text indexing and searching ..."

What do you think?

--Mortense (talk) 22:16, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

KinoSeach and Ferret[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to merge Kinosearch into this article, per merge proposal made in and uncontested since then. Ferret was deleted before the merge proposal was closed but was already included in this page, as is Apache Lucy. Euryalus (talk) 04:21, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

The C-based with Perl and respectively Ruby bindings "loose ports" should probably be merged here. They are briefly covered in the Lucene book, and don't have much additional coverage. Apache Lucy should be mentioned here as well. FuFoFuEd (talk) 16:07, 31 May 2011 (UTC)


The above discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.