Talk:Lula 3D/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 14:36, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

I really see no issues.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 14:36, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Hey, thanks Pumpkin! Are you passing the article? Nomader ^(Talk) 22:45, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

I did a second run, and I found only one mistake: "an 'erotic' adventure aimed squarely at "12 year old boys." - you forgot one quotation mark, and ref 4 redirects to another site, which can cause to a linkrot, so replace the url "http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=134078" with "http://www.computerandvideogames.com/134078/reviews/lula-3d-review/". But the article is in my opinion ready to get the status. Regards and congratulation!-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 17:17, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Grumble, I hate it when websites start to move urls around. Either way, I took care of the issues you've mentioned. Thanks again for the review, Pumpkin, and if you see anything else wrong in the article, feel free to let me know. Nomader ^(Talk) 19:56, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

You asked me if I pass it? Hell, yes :D! Congratulation!-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 13:58, 12 February 2011 (UTC)