Talk:Lund (disambiguation)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Hindi[edit]

So, one editor wants to insert this, and several others disagree. If there is consensus that such an entry should be present, so be it. However, it's difficult to establish consensus without discussion. So... here we are. – Luna Santin (talk) 22:27, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

  • Oppose addition Unless the author had a reputable source, and a reason why it should exist in the english Wikipedia, like C'est la vie, then leave it out. Urbandictionary is not a reputable source. --Terrillja (talk) 22:31, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
    • Indeed. Relevant policies might include WP:NOT#DICTIONARY. Appears to user pressing for inclusion is currently blocked, though, so this may all be moot. – Luna Santin (talk) 22:58, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
Yes, I saw that. We'll see in 6 months if they have learned their lesson.... Terrillja (talk) 23:03, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
This is perfect example of an admin or their juniors threatening others and misusing thier authority as Admins. VolcanicBasalt (talk) 21:11, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
The lesson I was referring to is that all editors, myself included must follow Wikipedia's policies. I don't get any preferential treatment over any other editor who has also followed the rules.--Terrillja talk 02:57, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Oppose addition. (Disclosure: I'm one of the editors that removed the item.) Although it now is probably moot, I just want to also point out that adding something like that is an absurdity. If something like that is allowed, then should the Portuguese Wikipedia have an entry for the Japanese word for ghost? Should the Punjabi Wikipedia have an entry for the Swahili word for bicep?--A bit iffy (talk) 07:43, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
    • Counter Point . Punjabi is not spoken in Countries where Swahili is spoken and vice verse. Actually the world doesnt run by the rules of english speaking people ( I mean who only speaks english . VolcanicBasalt (talk) 21:15, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Approve Addition Unless the admins have sufficient proof to remove something, they should not misuse thier athourity and behave like Big Brother behind Iron Curtain. VolcanicBasalt (talk) 20:48, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment You guys are being "Eurocentric" you people judge everyone in this world, but when it comes to you then you cant take it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.225.57.24 (talk) 07:32, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment You guys are behaving as if the english wiki belongs to only english people , I have read the arguments from other user/admins I feel that the edit I made must be included . Otherwise go ahead and remove the content about all other countries from english wikipedia. thier are more english speaking people in India that they are in UK. This term has been used multiple times in Indian English. Try googling the term < Lund India > . Meanwhile I feel that this should be here , so better give me a reason why it should NOT be here before removing it . I am reverting it back —Preceding unsigned comment added by VolcanicBasalt (talkcontribs) 20:21, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Oppose Addition This is a disambiguation page. The note at the bottom of the page decribes the purpose of this page.
"This disambiguation page lists articles associated with the same title."
Since no page on wikipedia other than this one has had this information on it, this addition does belong. Also if you read the Manual of Style for Disambuguateion pages the format of the entry is wrong.
  1. Entries are only supposed to have one blue link.
  2. Entries are not supposed to have piped links.
If these problems are corrected then it is possible to add the link to this page. A new name 2008 (talk) 20:24, 4 February 2009 (UTC)