Talk:MLS Reserve League

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

this includes the articles

WikiProject Football (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American and Canadian soccer task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American and Canadian soccer task force.

2007 Reserve Division Runners-up: Chivas USA or New England?[edit]

I understand that the Official MLS Site have listed Chivas USA ahead of New England in the final standings of 2007 Reserve Division. However why is that so? As they never met each other during the season (thus no head-to-head records), shouldn't GD be the tie-breaker (in which case New England's +6 would beat Chivas' +2)? This is also discussed on BigSoccer, which explored the possibility of PPG coming into play here. Are there any other reasons?


Should Reserve League game rosters be noted? --Coppercanuck (talk) 01:31, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

I'll ask it again. Now that MLS Reserves and USL Pro are playing meaningful, should the rosters be noted? --Coppercanuck (talk) 02:41, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MLS Reserve League. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:05, 28 May 2017 (UTC)