Talk:Machine Age

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Image copyright problem with Image:Moderntimes.jpg[edit]

The image Image:Moderntimes.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --21:30, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Information Age which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 08:45, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

The narrower art movement definition needs to be disambiguated[edit]

We need a disambiguation. The term "Machine Age" is frequently also used as a modern, retroactive label that refers to a particular branch or sub-style of Art Deco, specifically that angular, linear, mechanistic style that later had a huge influence on 1950s design (think chrome-striped diner style and Gernsback sci-fi pulp covers). The most obvious and best known example of Machine Age style is of course the feminoid robot in Metropolis (1927). A more recent, self-conscious use of the style is in the film Brazil, in the office scenes especially. For a zillion examples of what art and products of this style look like, probably the most expedient path is simply searching eBay for keywords like "Deco Machine Age", "vintage Machine Age" and "antique Machine Age". All my art books are in storage because I'm moving, but there have to be some references by now that use this term. It's distinguishable from the concept the current article is about in that it's a design and art movement or sub-movement, like Expressionism, Cubism, Dada, etc., not a general cultural "age", and it refers only to ca. 1925 through the immediately pre-WWII years. — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ   Contrib. 13:52, 18 September 2012 (UTC)