From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Malaysia has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
November 18, 2007 Featured article candidate Not promoted
October 13, 2009 Featured article candidate Not promoted
July 6, 2010 Peer review Reviewed
October 16, 2010 Good article nominee Not listed
November 12, 2010 Peer review Reviewed
December 17, 2010 Good article nominee Listed
July 11, 2011 Peer review Reviewed
December 21, 2011 Featured article candidate Not promoted
Current status: Good article

Malaysian Wikipedians[edit]

Malaysian Wikipedians can be found here.

Semi-protected edit request on 22 November 2017[edit]

Spelling error in "Foreign Relations and Military", third paragraph third sentence. "enroachment" to "encroachment" (talk) 08:03, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Done Thank-you for pointing that out! regards, DRAGON BOOSTER 08:39, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Name in infobox[edit]

Shouldn't the infobox have the country's official name (Federation of Malaysia)? ( (talk) 06:52, 15 December 2017 (UTC))

Good point,  Done --haha169 (talk) 10:04, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Undone... The full official name is "Malaysia"[1]: Article 1(1) of the Constitution - "The Federation shall be known, in Malay and in English, by the name Malaysia." I undid the change. -- Begoon 11:54, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Malaysia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:21, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 22 January 2018[edit]

The GDP unit is wrong. It should be Millions not Billions. OR you could change the comma to a decimal point.

Melissa Leong Citizen of Malaysia who lost a bet because of this (talk) 19:46, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Done Anon126 (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 22:04, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

update gdp (ppp) and gdp (nominal) for Malaysia 2018[edit]

2018 gdp (ppp) and gdp (nominal): GDP (PPP) $987.003 billion Percapita $30,140

Gdp (nominal) $338.233 billion Percapita $10,328

Source: Internantional Monetary Fund Ramadhanf (talk) 12:54, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 14 February 2018[edit]

Please add ↓


Malaysia Skyline
Malaysia skyline

AyaanLamar (talk) 09:58, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Well, personally, I think the HDR is a little overdone, but that's just an opinion and there's no denying it's a spectacular picture, as well as a featured pic on Chinese wikipedia. As it happens, I deleted a pic recently, so I'll add this as a replacement, and we'll see if anyone objects. I doubt anyone will. -- Begoon 10:22, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
 Done -- Begoon 10:41, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Lead is strong[edit]

I often grab large chunks of Wikipedia leads for my own notes, usually thinning substantially according to my own specific interests.

This is time-consuming up front, and therefore a source of constant personal friction: "do I really need to whack this down so much?" I am always asking myself in the moment. From a higher vantage point, when I'm not mired in the irritation of actually doing this, I think this practice of mine does ultimately pay off.

As a result of this tension, I certainly notice when a lead requires less hasty redaction than normal. This lead is very well organized, clear and comprehensive, and is very easy to follow at any reading speed.

Well done to the editors involved. — MaxEnt 13:02, 10 March 2018 (UTC)