Jump to content

Talk:Mamie Eisenhower/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Orson12345 (talk · contribs) 21:05, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

here for what they are not)


Good to go for to be listed as one of the GAs.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Hello! Very well written article, sources are good and extensive, images meet the criteria, and overall just a good article. Meets all the GA rules. I’m happy to approve this article for GA status, great work!--Orson12345 (TalkContribs) 21:06, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]