Q1: Why doesn't this article include Transjordan in its scope? Why isn't Transjordan shown as part of Mandatory Palestine on the map?
A1: This article is about the British administrative unit in Palestine. There is a separate article covering the entity of the Emirate of Transjordan, and the Mandate legal instrument which acted as the constitution for both of these administrations.
Q2: What was the status of Transjordan in the Mandate for Palestine ?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Mandatory Palestine. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Mandatory Palestine at the Reference desk, discuss relevant Wikipedia policy at the Village pump, or ask for help at the Help desk.
Editing restrictions for new editors: All IP editors, accounts with fewer than 500 edits, and accounts with less than 30 days tenure are prohibited from editing any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab–Israeli conflict.
Limit of one revert in 24 hours: All articles related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, reasonably construed, are under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per 24-hour period). When in doubt, assume it is related.
If an edit is reverted by another editor, its original author may not restore it within 24 hours of the first revert made to their edit
All Arab–Israeli conflict-related pages, broadly interpreted, are subject to discretionary sanctions: Any uninvolved administrator may levy restrictions as an arbitration enforcement action on users editing in this topic area, after an initial notification.
The exceptions to the 500/30 restriction are:
Editors who are not eligible to be extended-confirmed may use the Talk: namespace to post constructive comments and make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive. Talk pages where disruption occurs may be managed by any of the above methods. This exception does not apply to other internal project discussions such as AfDs, WikiProjects, noticeboard discussions, etc.
Editors who are not eligible to be extended-confirmed may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles by editors who do not meet the criteria is permitted but not required.
With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:
Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors that are not vandalism are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked without warning by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, realise, defence, artefact), and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
The area of the Palestinian Mandate is 26,582 km (10,263 sq mi) --- 22.214.171.124 (talk) 13:46, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
I realize this is a Very Contentious topic, but I was under the impression that the original British Mandate designated all of what is now Israel, Palestinian Authority, Golan Height, and Transjordan as "Palestine". That when the Brits partitioned off Transjordan in 1922, there was a plausible argument that what was left in the Mandate qualified as the Jewish National Homeland expressed in the Balfour Declaration and the San Remo Conference. Sussmanbern (talk) 23:20, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
You have accurately described a well known propaganda meme, which is provably false. Onceinawhile (talk) 15:11, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Do you have a source for this "plausible" opinion? The Franco British Boundary Agreements determined the final division between French and English Mandates while the Transjordan matter is explained in this article.Selfstudier (talk) 08:17, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
@Sussmanbern: - the transjordan issue is complex (note that the issue isn't entire Tranjordan - but just the portion of Tranjordan adjacent to the river) - however regardless of the merits/claims it wasn't part of the actual mandate. The Golan heights are a different matter entirely - they were in the French zone (there was a Jewish settlement in the Hauran area and some land ownership by Palestine Jewish Colonization Association (nationalized by the Syrian gvmt in 1948) - some 6,000 dunam in the Golan area, and 53,000 dunam east of the modern cease-fire line) - the Golan was never part of the British Mandate.Icewhiz (talk) 08:28, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
While the Golan was not a part of the British Mandate (Mandatory Palestine), it was indeed a part of Ottoman Palestine. Here, in Israel, our public diplomacy (hasbara) often stresses the fact the Syria had not possessed the Golan-heights region, until only in very recent history.Davidbena (talk) 13:12, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Sorry Davidbena but I can't let that pass. The Golan was part of the Ottoman Vilayet of Syria. The Ottoman Empire never had a region called Palestine which included the Golan. Perhaps you are thinking of the claim that the Golan was in Palestine until the British gave it to the French. There is a tiny bit of truth to it: as shown in this map a small sliver of the Golan passed from British into French hands in 1923. At the same time a larger sliver of Lebanon passed from French into British hands. In total, Palestine grew by 13 villages. Zerotalk 14:52, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Yes, Zero, I was thinking of the fact that the Golan passed from the British into French hands in 1923, but I was also thinking of what happened after that time - in 1948, with the very lands that were previously controlled by the Ottoman Turks before 1917. Syria and Jordan and Egypt have not offered any tenable legal justification for their twenty year presence within the frontiers of the former Mandated Territory of Palestine. This was territory for the disposition of which the General Assembly of the United Nations by its conduct in 1947 and 1948 assumed responsibility. Yet, neither the UN General Assembly, nor indeed any other authority lawfully vested with control over the areas occupied by Syria, Jordan and Egypt, ever granted those States rights within Palestinian frontiers. Syria, Jordan and Egypt entered and retained parts of Palestine by force of arms. In any rate, the hegemonic control over the Golan has changed hands many times. It was once controlled by Herod the Great and Agrippa II, and at other times by Rome.Davidbena (talk) 15:10, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
One more thing: In terms of ancient Jewish legal codes, parts of the Golan were settled by the returnees from the Babylonian captivity, and which made it forevermore the legal bounds of Israel, requiring Jews in any age or dispensation, or under any hegemonic power, to regard such territories as binding as far as the separation of tithes and Seventh-year restrictions are concerned. See Baraita of the Boundaries where it brings down the ancient Jewish tradition that Kefar Yaḥrīb, Nob, and Ḥisfiyyah - places all in the Golan Heights - were old Israeli settlements dating back to Israel's return from Babylonia in ca. 352 BCE and whose produce grown in such places thenceforth were (and still are) forbidden to eat until tithed. It goes without saying that produce grown outside the Land of Israel is exempt from tithing, unless required by rabbinic ordinance.Davidbena (talk) 18:03, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
It would appear that I was seriously mistaken/misinformed. I request that someone knowledgeable enlarge the article to clarify/debunk and otherwise address these important (if unsubstantiated) contentions, as (external to this page) I am not the only one so misinformed. Sussmanbern (talk) 06:12, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
This is a revisionist article. The Mandate for Palestine included both modern Israel, West Bank, Gaza, Jordan. All of it.
Amman was in Palestine, for example. Then the Brits split Mandatory Palestine area into "palestine" and "transjordan", giving the Arabs nearly 80% of Palestine in the form of Transjordan.
you are mistaken (you are repeating false propaganda). Please see the FAQ above. Transjordan was “added” to the mandate, not split. Onceinawhile (talk) 17:15, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Just read the mandate legal instrument article. It is all explained there. If you are too lazy to make the effort to understand, noone will bother interacting with you any further. Onceinawhile (talk) 19:30, 19 August 2018 (UTC)