Talk:Manipulative (mathematics education)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Manipulative (mathematics education) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Education Low‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mathematics Low‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Missing dollar[edit]

three guys get a hotel room for $30.the clerk at the desk said the room was only $25.so he gave the bell boy $5 to take to the 3 men.he gave each man $1 and kept $2.therefor each man paid $9.3x9 is 27 plus the 2 the bell boy kept is 29.what happened to the missing dollar?75.130.172.42 (talk) 15:25, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See missing dollar riddle. DS (talk) 14:44, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Shape Math™ is a brand-new patent pending technique[edit]

However good Shape Math™ is, as it stands this new section looks like it should be removed. There are no references and the text seems to be lifted from http://www.shapemath.com/Shape_Math/Shape_Math_Home_page.html . The ™ gives me the impression it's a commercial scheme; not a problem in itself, but there are no secondary sources for its use, even the Website that promotes it is not referenced. And the shape-work referred to seems to be virtual rather than physical. Please reply here if you have good reasons for it to remain. --Annielogue (talk) 07:12, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Number line[edit]

The section on the number line has critical analysis not present in the other sections and seems to be one person's point of view. It should be rewritten, removed, or sourced. 99.37.203.12 (talk) 18:55, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]