Talk:Mario Bros./GA1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


Pass, after several tweaks on my part. I'd strongly recommend putting this through a peer review though. -- Sabre (talk) 21:40, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    The fair use rationales are rather weak. I'd try bolstering them before taking the article any further
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    You could probably use a better caption on Image:Mario_Bros._Gameplay.gif
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
Thanks for the assessment, though I don't think I'll be taking it any further. I think I've milked as much information from the Internets as I can. The gameplay section is pretty much done, as is the ports and follow-ups section. Development and Reception may grow if I can find some print sources for the reviews, maybe some sales, and look around for interviews ABOUT Mario Bros. (maybe delve into development information about later versions). - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 22:16, 9 December 2008 (UTC)