|This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. If you are connected to one of the subjects of this article and need help, please see this page.|
|WikiProject Biography / Politics and Government||(Rated Start-class)|
|WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom||(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)|
The article has been updated and corrected significantly by different editors since COI issue was raised couple of years ago. Would it be possible to therefore remove that tag now?
Extra citations have also been made to improve sourcing. Could this be reflected please? I've made some of these edits, and I have no professional or family connection to the subject, no conflict of interest.
Constant reversions of Parliamentary expenses scandal info
At least two SPA editors continue to try and expunge Lazarowicz' involvement, which was well reported at the time and is well sourced in the article. If you don't think such information should be included, then please discuss here rather than revert? Little grape (talk) 08:10, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
COI - POV editing by employee?
This link  appears to indicate that the editor 'bockinga' may be Andrew Bocking, who is recorded in the public Register of Members' Secretaries and Research Assistants as an employee of his. Little grape (talk) 10:48, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Same old same old
Again this article suffers from IP edits by someone with a whitewash brush. And 'He is regarded as one of the foremost environmentalists in the Parliamentary Labour Party' is simply opinion. The matter of the expenses has been properly cited using reputable sources; if you want to present different facts then please supply similarly verifiable neutral sources to support such additions or alterations? Little grape (talk) 09:38, 11 December 2009 (UTC)