Talk:Mark Wahlberg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Wahlberg's Supernumery Nipple[edit]

We (my girlfriend and i) were trying to edit Mark Wahlberg's page to include reference to his supernumery extra nipple, referenced on a number of verified Wikipedia pages, but were unable to do so due to the 'Semi-protected Status' of this page. Whilst we do not dispute this, of course, we would like an Authority or perhaps merely an Officer of Wikipedia to please include this in his article, because this knd of distinct mutation would clearly have been an issue vital to his sense of belonging and Humanity in the crucial ages of his childhood when nothing but mockery might have befallen him from such a thing - this being, to be clear, a third nipple. Thank you for your kind attention to this matter and for your prompt action in this regard. Michael and Christelle, Bangkok, February 4, 2016. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.24.102.222 (talk) 17:47, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

You'll face two issues:
1) You will need to find a reliable source for this claim. Wikipedia articles are not reliable sources, though I would hope the articles you say you've found it in cite such sources.
2) You will need to demonstrate that this is a significant aspect of his life and/or career. Various notable people have various facts about them that we can confirm as true, but disregard as trivial. Richard Nixon, Mel Gibson and Andy García, for example, do not mention their congenital peculiarities. If you find reliable sources that discuss the claim and how it may have affect him, you might have something. - SummerPhDv2.0 19:27, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mark Wahlberg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:50, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Reinsertion of promotional content, advertisings in the lead, relatives in the infobox with no Wikipedia article and more fan trivia by a new user[edit]

I´m not gonna to revert the Walhberg article anymore, not for the reason of yield to the continuous foolish reinsertion of promotional stuff and trivial facts and addition of a family tree in the infobox with no article by one new user called jibix, but not to follow that never-ending silly game (which I'm already bored and tired) of non-sense revertions by such user, who in his last revertion on Wahlberg, he has no more excuses for his silly endless revertions, simply he reverted this again without any explanation after explaining to him this reasons according to the Wikipedia´s policy "OBVIOUS PROMOTIONAL stuff in the lede, ADVERTISINGS in the lede (own hamburgers business with no Wiki article) and FAN TRIVIA. no article, no mention in the infofox (never-ending family tree), as simple as that!". I can´t help anymore, besides I run the risk of being blocked (3RR), some may frown with this removals of useless content; so, you can keep stuffing the article with superfluous details, while many other important articles need for help. greetings, bye. Ajax1995 (talk) 15:34, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Recent vandalism[edit]

Apologies for my recent reversion of a correct edit, the vandalism was happening so quickly. Shearonink (talk) 03:53, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 15 external links on Mark Wahlberg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:39, 31 December 2016 (UTC)