Talk:Mark Zuckerberg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Facebook is banning innocent users[edit]

In recent years it has been widely reported that there have been increasing complaints from users of the social platform claiming they have been unfairly booted off without a valid explanation. Since many users have spent thousands of hours on facebook, uploaded family or professional photo's and even run businesses through facebook this has caused a growing resentment globally. Facebook staff rarely apologise or even admit to wrongdoing in these cases despite being clearly in the wrong and their terms of service are designed to give them the legal right to be complete assholes. My account kumbarillatree@yahoo.com was banned after I posted a harmless historical quote in a picture of Hitler. They have since admitted banning pictures of Hitler was wrong but I'm still permanently banned! Pictures of Hitler are now fine on facebook https://nationalfile.com/facebook-policy-pictures-of-hitler-are-fine-infowars-logo-is-banned/ After I was banned myself for no reason I did some research and found I wasn't alone. Here are some recent examples taken from the media. Facebook bans Saint Augustine quote as ‘hate speech’ https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/facebook-bans-saint-augustine-quote-as-hate-speech Catholic Priest Suspended from Facebook for Post About History of Islam https://churchpop.com/2017/06/06/priest-suspended-from-facebook-for-post-about-history-of-islam/ Facebook sharing this cat photo could get you BANNED https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/science-technology/717978/facebook-bans-user-sharing-cat-photo 8 times Facebook blocked users for daft reasons https://www.digitalspy.com/tech/a800647/8-times-facebook-blocked-users-for-seriously-stupid-reasons-from-mistaken-identity-to-fruity-fannies/ Is Facebook censoring conservatives or is moderating just too hard? Is Facebook censoring conservatives or is moderating just too hard?


Arie Hasit's incorrect claim[edit]

Arie Hasit claims Zuckerberg's "FaceMash" put pictures of two males OR two females next to each other, but Zuckerberg said UNDER OATH during questioning that it was in fact "girls" whose pictures were being used this way.

Facebook Fan Club?[edit]

This whole article is gratuitously biased!

--200.68.142.40 (talk) 17:52, 14 February 2020 (UTC) Baden k.

Semi-protected edit request on 19 February 2020[edit]

Hello, Wikipedia editors! I would like to add information regarding the theory that Mark Zuckerberg is the great, mythological lizard-man that heads our society under reverence, love, and respect. I would appreciate it if you considered this edit in one of the sections. Thanks! Valkoorsky18 (talk) 19:02, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

That would require some very significant coverage from reliable sources, see WP:UNDUE. – Thjarkur (talk) 19:19, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 4 May 2020[edit]

2409:4052:2EA0:12E2:A1BA:3C1D:5D20:F99F (talk) 07:04, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

This information is wrong sir

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. JTP (talkcontribs) 07:19, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Wrong Caption[edit]

The picture of Zuckerberg and Medvedev wrongly describes the latter as "President". It should be "Prime Minister" which was his function at the stated time of the meeting in October 2012.Nfr-Maat (talk) 05:14, 29 May 2020 (UTC)