Jump to content

Talk:Mars Cube One

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kkutina, Erikp1999, Courtneysawyer.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:37, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What's the item that drops down from the bottom

[edit]

After the reflectarray deploys on top, what is the frame that drops down from the bottom? (It's yellow in the photo of the mockup) -

... Found it: The Press kit labels it as the UHF antenna. - Rod57 (talk) 10:38, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confusion between text and NASA sourced graphics

[edit]

Based on images provided by NASA, MarCO-B is Wall-E, not MarCO-A. The provided reference mentions the names, but doesn't attribute them to one craft or the other, although the implied order could cause confusion. RowanHawkins (talk) 21:27, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MarCO Image of Mars

[edit]

During the press conference for InSight, a large image of Mars was taken. When it is readily available from JPL, it might be worth putting that image on to this page. The Amazing Matt (talk) 00:08, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Did this. The Amazing Matt (talk) 05:23, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MarCO Technology Suppliers

[edit]

Sending two 3-Axis stabilized CubeSats into deep-space and completing the mission is a great milestone for JPL,
and gives the Technology suppliers Space Tested Systems to provide for up-coming missions.
Should this information be integrated into the article?

Clip from: <https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/missions/mars-cube-one/in-depth/>
JPL, a division of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, manages MarCO,
InSight and MRO for NASA's Science Mission Directorate in Washington.

Technology suppliers for MarCO include:

  • Blue Canyon Technologies of Boulder, Colorado, for the attitude-control system;
  • VACCO Industries of South El Monte, California, for the propulsion system;
  • AstroDev of Ann Arbor, Michigan, for electronics;
  • MMA Design LLC, also of Boulder, for solar arrays; and
  • Tyvak Nano-Satellite Systems Inc., a Terran Orbital Company in San Luis Obispo, California, for the CubeSat dispenser system.


--dond (talk) 21:28, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

More details on what they did

[edit]

Article says they relayed data during EDL (7 mins?),

  • but for how long were they relaying data ? until how long after landing ?
  • Were both sats relaying the same UHF data ? on different X-band frequencies ?
  • What did they do before EDL ? comms tests, images ?
  • what did they do after the landing relay ? more comms tests, more images ? - Rod57 (talk) 14:47, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cruise problems and legacy

[edit]

More info in MarCO shows interplanetary cubesats possible but not easy : fuel leaks, solar steering, legacy missions. - Rod57 (talk) 14:13, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]