Talk:Maybank Tower (Kuala Lumpur)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Architecture (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Malaysia (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malaysia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Malaysia and Malaysia-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Skyscrapers (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
Note icon
This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

Proposed picture addition[edit]

Maybank Tower Kuala Lumpur 2.jpg

Here's another picture of the Tower from a different view, but the quality is much lower than the one of in the article. Any comments about this? A better picture from this view would be better. --Bruin_rrss23 (talk) 10:12, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Personally, Calvin Teo's version is much more atheistically pleasing in terms of coloring and angle, and sums up the structure pretty well. It's doesn't look very necessary to replace or add any images. - Two hundred percent 04:37, 26 April 2007 (UTC)