Talk:Medium specificity

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Aesthetics

Example needed[edit]

This article is hard to understand; an example would help a lot. -- Beland (talk) 18:30, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For example, in printmaking, printmakers are sometimes exhorted not to use a printmaking technique to merely make multiple copies that are meant to approximate a non-printmaking technique, such as painting. Instead printmakers are advised to look for the characteristics that the particular method of printmaking lends itself to. The result is expected to be a type of imagery that more clearly derives from the strengths and weaknesses and peculiar characteristics of that printmaking method than to imitation of an unrelated medium of visual expression. This is just an example. In fact I doubt if this is the example given by the formulators of the concept of medium specificity. Many more examples can be imagined: Photography has characteristics unlike the painting and drawing that preceded it in time. The concept of medium specificity would probably call for a delving into the natural "inclinations" of that medium, whatever that may mean, in practice. But this is just a concept. Of course we have photorealistic painting. Photorealistic painting may violate the principle of medium specificity, but it is nevertheless good. The above is all original research. I don't know what examples were given by the original formulators of this concept. Perhaps someone else does. Here's a link to something on the subject. Bus stop (talk) 19:57, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Medium specificity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070208085350/http://chicagoschoolmediatheory.net/glossary2004/specificity.htm to http://www.chicagoschoolmediatheory.net/glossary2004/specificity.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:32, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]