Talk:Michael Avenatti

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Michael Avenatti article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

This article was nominated for deletion on November 6 2017. The result of the discussion was delete.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Donald Trump

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Donald Trump, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Donald Trump on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Donald TrumpWikipedia:WikiProject Donald TrumpTemplate:WikiProject Donald TrumpDonald Trump articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Swetnick Declaration Not an Affidavit[edit]

An affidavit is a written statement that an affiant or deponent swears to be true before an authorized party such as a notary public. A declaration is a written statement of belief that does not require swearing before an authority. I have seen the images Avenatti posted of a declaration over the signature of Swetnick and of a declaration Avenatti posted on Facebook from another woman backing the accusations by Swetnick and Ford with that declarant's name blacked out. Both Swetnick and the unnamed declarant separately told NBC that they signed the declarations without reading them and said that when they read them afterwards what he wrote in the declarations was not what they told Avenatti when they spoke with him.

Swetnick Unsworn Declaration (not an affidavit) https://web.archive.org/web/20210125062606/https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-09-25%20Swetnick%20Declaration.pdf

28 U.S.C. § 1746 Unsworn Declarations Under Penalty of Perjury "Wherever, under any law of the United States or under any rule, regulation, order, or requirement made pursuant to law, any matter is required or permitted to be supported, evidenced, established, or proved by the sworn declaration, verification, certificate, statement, oath, or affidavit, in writing of the person making the same (other than a deposition, or an oath of office, or an oath required to be taken before a specified official other than a notary public), such matter may, with like force and effect, be supported, evidenced, established, or proved by the unsworn declaration, certificate, verification, or statement, in writing of such person which is subscribed by him, as true under penalty of perjury, and dated ..."

--Naaman Brown (talk) 15:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Leonard v. Pepsico, Inc.[edit]

Hi I am a little new to wikipedia but if anyone knows about the case, Michael at the time was a law student and wanted to help out with the Leonard v. Pepsioco, Inc case as it was developing and proposed a smear campaign against Pepsi to be used for the case. He was a critical character in the recent Netflix movie "Pepsi where's my Jet?"

https://www.salon.com/2022/11/19/pepsi-wheres-my-jet-netflix-pepsi-point-scandal/ https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2022/nov/18/pepsi-wheres-my-jet-review-the-oddly-dull-tale-of-a-man-who-sued-a-soft-drink-for-a-weaponised-plane 108.26.206.157 (talk) 06:01, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has a Pepsi Points Case article Leonard v. Pepsico, Inc. (created 13 Jun 2005, edits to 22 Nov 2022) that appsrntently does not consider Avenatti's 1996 involvement in the case notable. He does appear in the movie Pepsi, Where My Jet? as himself so it is a notable bit of trivia there (Leonard balked at Avenatti’s proposed heavy-handed tactics and they were not part of the Leonard v Pepsico case as presented in court, as best I can figure). -- Naaman Brown (talk) 19:20, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It seems it was actually Hoffman who had a problem with the strategy, rather than Leonard. But Leonard backed Hoffman over Avenatti due to loyalty (Hoffman was there from the start, a long time friend, and had financed Leonard’s business). Even though he chose Hoffman’s strategy, he felt that Avenatti’s strategy was more advantageous and was leaning towards it. 2A02:C7C:5249:3500:410A:D910:CC89:B343 (talk) 15:19, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Porn lawyer" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect Porn lawyer has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 8 § Porn lawyer until a consensus is reached. An anonymous username, not my real name 01:11, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sentence[edit]

The infobox claims that Avenatti is serving a 20.5 year sentence. From the articles I read I believe that the Nike and Daniels sentences are partially consecutive, meaning that he is serving a 19 year sentence. Sorakatana8 (talk) 16:12, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]