This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cannabis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cannabis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
My own opinion, as the original author and former resident of Hamilton where they are best known, is that they are fringe people worth little more than a stub collectively. Either man individually would not warrant an article, or if they got their own articles they would be criticised as a stub. Because they work in tandem, religiously and politically, you would effectively have to clone this article for no good purpose.
However, if somebody feels like interviewing Brothers Wally and Michael, or poring over court documents to get more in-depth biographical details of arrests, charges and trials, and in the process really boosting the content, then yes, split.
OTOH, I'd have no problems merging it with the Church of the Universe. There is a role for the fringe, but by definition it is small. IIRC, I had planned to put the few biographical details there, but Baldassaro was already redlinked so I just wrote him a short little article.
In my opinion this article, both in its tone and the type of facts it chooses to present, prejudges both this individual and his organization. Regardless of the topic, neutrality is an important component in any Wikipedia article. thank you Deconstructhis (talk) 01:35, 2 January 2009 (UTC)