Talk:Military computers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Regarding the previous copyright tag; I check some of the text and did not find it anywhere else. Chassisplans 23:57, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

The last paragraph sounds like the conclusion of a vague term paper. -- 14:46, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Missing reference to Electromagnetic Pulse Protection[edit]

There needs to be a reference to the following standard for protection against EMP

This is because my first job as an electronics engineer in 1985 was in military avionics, and every piece of electronics had a crowbar circuit to protect against it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FlashJackFromGundagai (talkcontribs) 15:02, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Still a subtle advertising page[edit]

Still reads like a Chassis Plans subtle ad. YMMV (talk) 21:05, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Slow Adoption Rate[edit]

"The progress of small-scale computer technology in military applications was initially slow due to concerns about security and the ability to survive rugged environments and enemy weaponry. PC-based technology in the 20th century was not robust enough to withstand combat conditions and severe environments."

Not to mention that until the late 80's, soldiers had the option to be a grunt, a CO, or a civilian. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 21:55, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Military computers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:55, 31 January 2018 (UTC)