Talk:Military history of the Philippines during World War II

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

To Do - more prose to fill in the outline below: additions, corrections welcome!

File:SmallOCS.jpg
These Filipino soldiers would be sent from Brisbane, Australia to the Philippines by submarine, prior to the invasion

English[edit]

Can someone who speaks english as a native tongue please work on this article? I don't have time to correct EACH MISTAKE in this article, but the sentence structure and grammar is atrocious.Dragonnas (talk) 20:51, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

English, when being referred to as a language is a proper noun. As such, it should be capitalized.

You erroneously used the word atrocious to describe the sentence structure and grammar in this article. Other than two or three words that should not have been capitalized and it's instead of its, the whole article was intelligible right up to March, 2008. I understood the whole article; that is what matters to me.

Are you sure that those atrocious sentence structure and grammar were not done by native English speakers?IsaLang (talk) 11:58, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese Motives During World War II[edit]

The claims made in the article about how Japan came to attack U.S. forces in the Philippines is blatantly absurd. While the Japanese were hardly benevolent or benign, they were certainly not driven by a belief that "all Asian lands" somehow belonged to Japan. That's propaganda, and a particularly bad one at that. Somebody should write more factually on Japan's strategic rivalry with the United States in the Pacific and the evolution of its strategy in case of a war--and where in that strategy Philippines fit in.128.196.23.228 (talk) 21:52, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV[edit]

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
  1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
  2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
  3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:30, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All the lands of Asia?[edit]

In the section on the Japanese decision to attack it is stated, without providing a source, that Japan "viewed all the lands of Asia to be the rightful property of the Imperial Japanese Government and the Emperor" and that "central to the Japanese goals was the taking of all Asian lands." This would seem to be extraordinary if true (all the lands of Asia, right up to the Bosphorus and the Urals?); if Japanese policy-makers in fact held such ambitions it needs to be sourced. 850 C (talk) 14:04, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

american international multimillionares society organization[edit]

i just want to ask cause my great grand fathr is register nunder june 10 1942 date of induction under gen. miguel sayson and date of discharge march 11 1945, cant seem to find the organization49.149.6.225 (talk) 03:21, 4 November 2015 (UTC)jeoffrey san jose[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Military history of the Philippines during World War II. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:31, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:12, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:57, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]