Talk:Molecular biology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

citations needed[edit]

will address the 5 citations needed[1]...--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:27, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Good job. That leaves unanswered the hitherto unstated question, which is "does the article as constituted cover the main aspects of the topic?" The emphasis given to the blotting techniques at least hints that coverage might be highly unbalanced. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:29, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
agree--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:21, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
The point is simply, that an inline citation (in short form if desired, when a source applies to multiple statements) makes the text clearer and stronger, showing exactly what came from where; whereas an 'additional sources' section makes things more obscure, leaving the reader in doubt as to what came from where. If a source offers new and useful facts, put them in the article, and cite them; if the facts are already there, put the source beside those particular facts. If you were planning to connect the source to existing facts with short refs, go right ahead, do that. Just couldn't see what was going on. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:50, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

fighting hiv virus out of human body using nano technology[edit]

we cuold use nano technology to help get hiv virus out of human body manually — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.62.204.184 (talk) 21:00, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

try Nanotechnology or Viruses instead--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 21:18, 14 January 2017 (UTC)