|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
Montreal and Warsaw Conventions
differences between montreal convention and Warsaw convention. Discuss fully
- What are we? Your slave? 188.8.131.52 09:27, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- This reads more like a sales pitch than a wikipedia article, and as such does not have a neutral POV, flagging as such. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 13:18, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Inaccurate content with respect to "psychiatric injury" ("mental distress")
This question is perhaps one of the most heavily litigated issues relating to the Montreal Convention. The European Court of Justice interprets the Convention as allowing "non-material damages." This has been followed in Europe, and in Quebec in Canada. On the other hand, there are authorities that attempted to interpret the Montreal Convention based case law involving its predecessor, the Warsaw Convention, as precluding "non-material" or "general" damages. So, this is a very complex question that even courts have been able to agree among each other.
Rewriting the section in a concise and clear way is likely beyond my skills, but I would be happy to provide input and many additional references to provide a neutral view of the question. Gabor Lukacs (talk) 22:39, 23 May 2016 (UTC)