Why isn't this (the above) listed in the "See also" section? --Ludvikus (talk) 23:09, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
No need - there is already the main entry for that Moonie in the main section; if people want information on those Moonies, they'd click on that article, and for further information on the blue links within that article. Boleyn2 (talk) 08:10, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
As it appears that Moonie (Unification Church) is not going to be moved to Moonie, and an article title can not redirect to its own disambiguator, I'm moving the disambig page back to the base title. bd2412T 00:03, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Since the result of the discussion was not to do that, I've pointed Moonie to Moonie (Unification Church) instead, which seems to be opposed by only one of the above editors. (Besides, this talk page was orphaned in the move.) Station1 (talk) 10:56, 20 February 2010 (UTC)