Talk:Morecambe and Lunesdale (UK Parliament constituency)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Morecambe and Lunesdale (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:08, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Names of candidates[edit]

I added the names of the candidates as published in the official list of nominations, sourced. This was reverted, with edit summary "This reflects the consensus in the extended discussion at UKpolitics and also note wp:blpprivacy".

Without getting into an edit war, I don't understand why we should not use the full form of the names published by the council elections office, and can't see that there is a privacy issue given that the full names will be on ballot papers seen by thousands of voters. If we shorten the names, we need sources for each chosen short form, as not everyone uses their first given name. Unsourced short forms are WP:OR.

Could someone point me to the previous discussions, to help me understand this? Thanks. PamD 13:35, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's convention in English language writing to only use middle names either in the article about the person themselves (as part of the lede, to fully identify the person), or when disambiguation is needed from other people with the same personal and family names. This is common English usage, not a wikipedia-specific guideline. Rhialto (talk) 09:56, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]