Talk:Morphogen

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled[edit]

More on the molecular biology of Morphogens are required. SteveD 31st May 2008.

Recent morphogen research challenges the textbook view[edit]

There has been a lot of recent work on morphogens that substantially challenges or revises the traditional view of factors such as Bicoid. The April, 2012 Cell commentary by Roth and Lynch provides an overview of these advances ([1]). SpectraValor (talk) 14:10, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This topic is in need of attention from an expert on the subject.

The section or sections that need attention may be noted in a message below.

Indeed the article urgently needs updating by an expert on the subject. Science has clearly moved on, as have our referencing standards. This article is an embarrassment. Which sections? Most of it. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:24, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is an entire field of work in embryogenesis based on other models such as those based on mechanics that disputes the whole morphogen idea. The article should not just be made neutral (which I have tried to do) but should have some references to other alternative models. Bjorklund21 (talk) 15:22, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay on review I like the review so I am removing my initial comment.

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Morphogen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161013223611/https://www.ibiology.org/ibiomagazine/eric-wieschaus-and-christiane-nusselin-volhard.html to https://www.ibiology.org/ibiomagazine/eric-wieschaus-and-christiane-nusselin-volhard.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:43, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]