|WikiProject Evolutionary biology|
This article needs a thorough 'going over', for language etc. No time for me to do it, just now but I've starrted. - Ballista 21:23, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
You can say that again: "Almost of human features, when compared with proximal apes were from this nature, not implying a lot of change in structural genes, as classically was considered." Wot? — OttoMäkelä (talk) 14:17, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- I've started trying to fix it. That sentence -- I think -- means "Most novel human features (compared to closely related apes) were of this nature, not implying major change in structural genes, as was classically considered." Vultur (talk) 10:52, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
It seems to me that the section 'Background' is not on the same subject. I propose to cut it out, but wait for other comments.