Talk:Mount Conness

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject California (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Mountains (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Faded from history?[edit]

The article now states, "Excepting for this mountain, however, his name has almost faded from history." I disagree with this statement. Conness was the U.S. Senator represting California who introduced the legislation, in the midst of the Civil War, that set aside and protected Yosemite Valley and a sequoia grove to the south. This landmark bill was signed by Abraham Lincoln, created the Yosemite Grant, and was an essential precursor to our Natinal Park system. Some fading. Cullen328 (talk) 04:20, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Faded from history? Redux[edit]

The offending phrase was part of the original quote made by Francis P. Farquhar, in his book Place Names of the High Sierra (1926). (See References.) I agree it sounds like a bit of a cheap shot, but I think Farquhar was speaking more about Conness's name rather than his effect. However, your point is taken and the offense or lament (however you take it) can go.

MKevH (talk) 18:47, 24 December 2012 (UTC)