This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Alaska on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Given the recent edit changing to 4671 m, it would be good to have a definitive reference for the elevation, if such exists. I'll try to look into it. -- Spireguy 03:36, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
I gave the original elevation at 4663 m, which I believe I got from PeakWare. The 4671 m appears to be from bivouac.com. The GNIS entry lists 4604 m (15,105 ft). RedWolf 09:19, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
National Park Service indicates the elevation of 4669m (15,300 ft). . --Alwaystravel (talk) 01:36, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Peakbagger also gives 4671 m (as does bivouac.com above).
Several US sources give the 15,300 feet elevation, which looks like a rounded figure and actually converts to 4663 m, not 4669. Maybe it's not a rounding, but my gut feeling is to not trust that figure. --RacerX11Talk to meStalk me 02:10, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
How come Navteq is claiming that the peak of Fairweather Mountain lies within Alaska? -- Denelson83 10:20, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
The legal summit is the summit, i.e. the treaty stipulated the summit as the boundary, not some abstract point; there may have been a survey error such that the original perceived latlong was not quite correct so that it is on the US side of the summit; I'm not sure the wording of the treaty, it could be points-as-surveyed/chartered or a more purely geographic reference such as "from the summit of Mount Fairweather to...".Skookum1 (talk) 21:41, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
It's also worth commenting that US-side sources, particularly government documents, are often misrepresentative of the treaty realities, often blatantly so. Take a look at Topozone's Dixon Entrance map, then use BC's online topographic system to compare; the Canadian/BC version is as the treaty reads; the Topozone one is the USGS like other US agencies and politicians pretends is reality (oil leases in Canadian/Haida waters...)....so it could simply be the same kind of thing, or a little-boy kind of thing - "No - WE have the top of the hill. Nyaa Nyaa." Not that troops could be landed to settle the dispute, as with Hans Island....Skookum1 (talk) 21:44, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Interesting; I just printed out and uploaded to my own webspace the BC Gov's online mapping system's version, which shows the summit on the Canadian side of the boundary, and I seem to recall something somewhere, maybe in bivouac.com, that that was the case; or maybe that was about St. Elias. Anyway this is the map.Skookum1 (talk) 22:00, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Further to which, I visited WikiSource for the text of the Hay-Herbert Treaty, but don't see anything specific about surveyed/chartered points; "the summits of the mountains" or some equivalent phrase is what applies. Surprising in this case that both Canada and the US have different mapped versions.....when I get time I'll inspect the latlongs; what's Navteq? I'll see if it's googleable, but will check Topozone/USGS also.Skookum1 (talk) 22:03, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Tanaku Mountain - Tlingit, according to BCGNIS anyway
The French name may be from the time of La Perouse; the German names probably from ethnographers who frequented Russian America, the Russian and Spanish names devolving from those Empire's claims/charting of the area. Just noting these for now; they could be included in the name section somewhere maybe.Skookum1 (talk) 18:19, 6 November 2009 (UTC)