Talk:Mount Greylock/GA1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Mr. R00t Talk 19:41, 22 August 2010 (UTC) Review done. This is now a good article. Mr. R00t Talk 19:41, 22 August 2010 (UTC)


Review abandoned as per WT:Good article nominations#Mount Greylock. New reviewer please start under here. Jezhotwells (talk) 11:49, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

GA Criteria[edit]

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: - Mostly.
    C. No original research: -probably not
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc: -<l>No edit wars but plenty of vandalism</l> None in last 60 days.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

It looks good to go. Mr. R00t Talk 19:40, 22 August 2010 (UTC)