Talk:Mr. Do!

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Video games (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Apple Inc. (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Macintosh, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

Archives[edit]

An archive of this talk page exists at Talk:Mr. Do!/Archive . — KieferSkunk (talk) — 21:37, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Cleanup[edit]

I cut back the gameplay section, trying to keep some of the relevant points. A lookover by someone familiar with the game would be good. --Lendorien 20:30, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

I'm posting this back on cleanup. Someone reverted my edits after I fixed it and removed it from cleanup in Oct, claiming they were unfair based on the fact that Pac-man has a long description. This is little justification to keep it the way it was. I hate to say it, but what it was reverted to is a lengthly unpargraphed mess of poorly worded descriptions of the game that make little sense, are hardly readable and are not needed for an article about a game that is as non-notable as this one. I personally think that what I edited to it would have been fine and more concise, but I don't want to create a revert war here by going back to it myself. Maybe someone else can find a happy medium. See my original edit here. If you make changes, post on the Talk page to prevent a revert war with the original author. --Lendorien 16:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
This is a reply to an old comment (and I archived a more recent and very massive entry further down on the page). I rewrote the page just a bit ago to conform with project guidelines and WP:TRIVIA. The current version should be a good point from which we can expand into areas such as cultural impact and reception. Hope it helps. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 21:40, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Protection[edit]

Please do not add the {{sprotect}} template, since this page is not and has never been protected [1]. I do not see much vandalism here, and actually the last instance of it I could find is from September 2006. I have added this page to my watchlist, anyway, so that I could protect it if I see an unusual amount of vandalism here. Tizio 13:56, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

To elaborate a little more on this: a page is not protected by simply adding templates such as {{sprotect}} to it. It is protected via the form [2], which only works for administrators. Tizio 14:01, 7 March 2007 (UTC)