This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
This article cites a work by "Leaman (2007)" but no further information about that work is provided in the list of references or elsewhere. (There is a link to an Oliver Leaman page, but no 2007 work appears on it.) Txensen (talk) 18:35, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
wikipedia should not allow freshmen islamic studies majors to articles on the most important islamic philosopher of all time, just because they wrote a heavily-plagiarized term paper on mulla sadra for spring term.
mulla sadra's philosophy is practically impossible to comprehend, but this article need not be. nor should it look like it was written by a fourth grader. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk) 07:53, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
The article title "Mulla Sadra" is not consistent with the Persian spelling of the name. The correct spelling is " Molla Sadra" if one does not use diacritics, and "Molla Şadra" if one does.184.108.40.206 (talk) 21:53, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
From the article: "This clever solution provides for Freedom of Will, God's Supremacy, the Infiniteness of God's Knowledge, the existence of Evil, and a definition of existence and essence which leaves two inextricably linked insofar as Man is concerned, but fundamentally separate insofar as God is concerned". So you say there is a solution but will not talk about it? For me this is absolutely incomplete. 220.127.116.11 (talk) 21:47, 24 July 2014 (UTC)