Talk:Multiverse

Proponent?

In the proponents/skeptics section should Hugh Everett (of the many-worlds interpretation) not be listed as a proponent? 173.228.123.166 (talk) 04:29, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Well, many worlds interpretation means multiverse...Kartasto (talk) 09:57, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Added with (easily found) source. Prinsgezinde (talk) 08:29, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Shouldn't we have a separate list that says "former proponents no longer living include" which has Hugh Everett and Stephen Hawking? Once someone is deceased, they are no longer a proponent or skeptic. RightGot (talk) 12:35, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

The Conglomerate (of Universes): Multiverse without random bubble universes and parallel worlds

"The BIG Bang-Bit Bang was a supermassive white hole – inflation expansion of energy/matter and information 13.8 billion years ago - spawned by a supermassive black hole at the heart of a galaxy in our parent universe. This duality combines general relativity’s singularities of infinite density in a ‘Cosmic Egg’ birth of this and all universes within The Conglomerate: multiverse without random bubble universes and parallel worlds. Our Universe exists inside the Planck density of that SBH and shares the same boundary/event horizon. That SBH-SWH phase transition was an umbilical Einstein-Rosen wormhole with energy/matter and information transformed and transferred. This Universe is 1-in-2 trillion offspring each with similar inherited physical constants. This ‘simple’ cause-and-effect cycle/circle of life – birth-life-death-transformation-rebirth - explains both infinite space and eternity. Reproduction is the simplest plan of continued existence for everything from cells to plants to animals to humans to universes. 2601:580:D:5BA2:AD5F:59F:A54C:851A (talk) 15:04, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

The Cyclic Undivided Raspberry Multiverse.

The Cyclic Undivided Raspberry Multiverse. https://vixra.org/pdf/1911.0346v1.pdf Abstract, The Benjamin Libet discovery of two different Readiness Potentials (RPI and RPII) and the potential to VETO an act, is reason to suggest the presence of a Super Symmetric multiverse with entanglement down to each quantum and wavefunction.. However, Libet did not Notice, because he (or his successors) did not measure the ratio between RPI and RPII , as a base for the total number of SuSy Universes. At the same time John Cramer proposed a parallel Transactional Interpretation (T.I.) a so called “Handshake system” responsible for entanglement and wavefunction collapse processes between anti copy systems on earth. However If we take such a handshake system as functional for each (anti material) copy quantum, living inside one of the entangled anti copy universal bubbles, then we may accept it as the start for NEW PHYSICS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leo Vuyk (talk • contribs) 11:45, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Fundamentally incoherent

ok, according to this article:

"The multiverse is a hypothetical group of multiple universes. Together, these universes comprise everything that exists: the entirety of space, time, matter, energy, information, and the physical laws and constants that describe them."

But the article for "Universe" says:

"The universe (Latin: universus) is all of space and time and their contents including planets, stars, galaxies, and all other forms of matter and energy."

So which is it?

These discussions are fundamentally incoherent. ---Dagme (talk) 19:16, 4 April 2020 (UTC)