Talk:MyEdu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Articles for creation (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article was created via the article wizard and reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow unregistered users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 
Note icon
This article was accepted on 26 July 2010 by reviewer Chzz (talk · contribs).

This article is suspicious--it seems that it has been written by employees of the company as a form of advertising, rather than a source of encyclopedic information. This article should be reviewed.

Why did "Company Progression" get removed? That is a factual part of the company that is backed by more than source. Also, why is the page or more specifically me being targeted as having a conflict of interest? Wtferguson (talk) 15:53, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

  • It's a laundry list of trivia. And you're being targeted because Google says you probably work for them and you are unquestionably a sngle-purpose account, which reinforces that suspicion. Guy (Help!) 20:37, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Ok, I can see your point of view about the company progression. I've created an informative page that used to not exist, therefore adding to the purpose of Wikipedia. How should I go about getting this page and myself for that matter off of the conflict of interest list? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.77.97.250 (talk) 16:51, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

citations are to articles quoting their own press releases[edit]

For example, the article states "largest academic repository of course, grade history and degree information in the United States" and then cites an article where that is indeed stated - in a quote of the company's own press release.

This 'article' is clearly advertising, and perhaps should even be marked as spam. Indeed, I found this page because I received spam email from this company and I was seeking information about them. It seems they are trying to use Wikipedia to back the legitimacy of their spam emails. Buckeye1973 (talk) 15:36, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

The "Spam" section has obvious misspellings. You should be ashamed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nateb2003 (talkcontribs) 15:23, 30 November 2011 (UTC)