Talk:My Life (Oswald Mosley autobiography)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Has anyone read this? I'm curious as to how this man retrospectively views his own life in light of his blackened name. --Randall00 Talk 22:47, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

What an arrogant man. 'My Life'. How boring. (talk) 23:16, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Given the polarizing nature of Mosley's post-parliament political career, the article should give us some idea of the book's content and not just go on about how well it sold, how it was promoted, and how well-written its blurbs claim it to be. Is it a mea culpa, and apologia, an act of defiance...what? (The above link to the online version of the book is no longer active, by the way.) TheScotch (talk) 09:20, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:19, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Kind of bogus[edit]

The plaudits from the wife's book are kind of a test case of distortion, in that (like those one-adjective lines used on movie posters) they omit the rest of the review, which could be simply offering an iota of praise among a cartload of opprobrium. Recommend deletion. Theonemacduff (talk) 15:37, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

I agree, this article is a joke. Thatsmeme (talk)16:38, 26 June 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk)