Talk:Mysaifu JVM

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Java (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Java, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Java on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-Class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
WikiProject Computing / Software (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
 
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-Class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

Not notable?[edit]

To my knowlegde, it's the only current Java SE JVM to run on Windows Mobile. (certainly the only opensource one). The potential demand for such a product is arguably proportional to the demand for PocketPC computers. It is thus notable.

It has been argued that this product is advertising. That's ridiculous, because this is a completely opensource effort. Tcaudilllg (talk) 14:16, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Whether its notable or not or advertising or not, its definatly very short! EA210269 (talk) 15:46, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Because it's a STUB. There is a difference between the people who create new articles just to account for notable content (like me) and the other people who flesh it out. (people more committed to the "soul" of this project) But anyway, why does it matter? Details on the VM are sketchy and it's still in beta. Not much else is known about it. But, it's also the only one still being worked on for Pocket PC. (unless you count Waba, which I don't).
If I suspected that I would not be alone in the effort, I would attempt to document it. But it would have to be a team affair. Whether or not it is expanded, it is still notable. Tcaudilllg (talk) 20:17, 16 May 2008 (UTC)