Talk:Mystic Manor

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mystic Manor article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Amusement Parks: Walt Disney Parks and Resorts Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Walt Disney Parks and Resorts task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Hong Kong Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (25)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (58) • B-Class articles (280)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (989)

Image needed (344)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,326) • Stub-Class articles (6,691)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (399) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,241)

Horror

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Disney Mid‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in Hong Kong English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Considering that the Garfield episode is not an article, but a redirect with no chance of expansion, there are no other articles of this title. Cúchullain ^t/c 15:51, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

– I believe the article on the upcoming attraction at Hong Kong Disneyland is more notable than a redirect for an episode title. A quick news search for the Garfield and Friends episode reveals no results. The attraction at least has some results (which I expect will increase as the attraction's opening comes closer). On a page view basis over the past 90 days, the redirect has been hit 355 times while the attraction has been viewed 4731 times (~13x more). A hatnote could be added to the attraction article to point to the Garfield redirect. Themeparkgc Talk 00:28, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alternate Make "Mystic Manor" a disambiguation page instead. The episode would be renamed, but the attraction would not be moved (it hasn't opened yet, so moving it would be premature). -- 76.65.128.43 (talk) 05:59, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The episode article is only a redirect. I also don't think it is premature since the results I have shown above already indicate more references to the attraction than the 1989 episode. If there wasn't such a gap in page views (i.e. 13x) I'd be sitting at the same point as you. Themeparkgc Talk 06:13, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The episode page contains the edit history of the episode article that was merged into the list. Moving things that haven't opened is premature. Anything that hasn't opened yet only have tentative names. Marketing can always choose to rename them. -- 76.65.128.43 (talk) 11:56, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. I suggest this arrangement for the three relevant titles:

Not useful to jump to the conclusion (as editors frequently do) that there is a primary topic. That does not help readers at all in the present case.

Noetica^Tea? 02:01, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be willing to support this arrangement as an alternative. Themeparkgc Talk 03:06, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support This is absurd. We don't have an article on the Garfield and Friends episode anymore, so it can't make any claims toward primary topic. Also, the redirect has no mainspace links. That leaves one article with this title. Remove the unnecessary disambiguation, add a hatnote if we really think it's necessary, and move on. --BDD (talk) 17:28, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

New picture[edit]

It needs a new picture from when it opened. Man Vs. Food 02:58, 2 June 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manvs.Food (talk • contribs)

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mystic Manor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140103100734/http://wonderland912.blogspot.hk/2011/10/voice-of-lord-henry-mystic.html to http://wonderland912.blogspot.hk/2011/10/voice-of-lord-henry-mystic.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:41, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Time to remove "More citations needed"?[edit]

I added a number of sources; third-party sources from Imagineers, D23 interviews, and actual video from the ride included. Looking at other comparable Disney park rides, it seems appropriate to remove the warning from this article now. The level of citation here resembles other Disney rides which do not have this warning: Astro Orbiter, The Hall of Presidents, The Magic Carpets of Aladdin. ClaudeDavid (talk) 18:02, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]