From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article NASA has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
edit·history·watch·refresh Stock post message.svg To-do list for NASA:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
  • Update : Keep article up to date with NASA

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on NASA. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:13, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Plutonium section[edit]

Worth having mention of RTG development, but does really deserve a top-level heading?

--2001:4898:80E8:3:0:0:0:274 (talk) 01:27, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

I agree, it absolutely does not. I moved it up into Scientific research, where it seems to go best. JustinTime55 (talk) 12:31, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Dead link[edit]

There appears to be a dead link in the external sources section. The dead link is "Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth." It'd be great if someone with permission could delete it or find the right path. Thanks! Hugo Day (talk) 13:23, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - I also updated several links to https and marked one as dead. If anyone has a replacement for NASA records available for research at the National Archives at Atlanta, that one also needs to be fixed. 0x0077BE (talk · contrib) 22:58, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Caption on Space Shuttle program (1972–2011)[edit]

For section Space Shuttle program (1972–2011), there is a picture captioned "A women..." Should be corrected to "A woman..." Jasonman101 (talk) 06:39, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Changed to "Mae Jemison..." -- AxG /  10 years of editing 17:30, 30 December 2016 (UTC)