Talk:N = 4 supersymmetric Yang–Mills theory
In the article the Lagrangian is given as:
But in the reference the Lagrangian reads:
I am not an expert on this topic, maybe the two formulations are equivalent or the source is wrong.
The title of this article is N = 4 supersymmetric Yang–Mills theory. What is confusing to me, is whether there is a difference between a "supersymmetric" theory and a basic N=4 Yang-Mills theory. If all N=4 Yang-Mills models support SUSY interpretation, then can we rename the article as N = 4 Yang–Mills theory, and explain in the article that it must contain SUSY? We could create redirects from the current title, even. If there is a difference, I feel the article shous spend more time explaining the SUSY aspect of the distinction. 18.104.22.168 (talk) 18:19, 2 January 2014 (UTC)