Talk:Nanosecond

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Time (Rated List-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 List  This article has been rated as List-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Move discussion in process[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:1 E-18 s which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RFC bot 21:49, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

General[edit]

I think a reference to Grace Hopper is unneeded; I have removed it. (or not fully explained in THIS article)

Mydogtrouble (talk) 17:28, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

"it takes light a nanosecond to go a foot (in a vacuum, slower in copper)" doesn't make sense since light's speed in copper is zero because it's an opaque substance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martnym (talkcontribs) 09:05, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Ladies and gentleman,

please come to some agreement regarding the following:

A picosecond is to one second as one second is to 31,710 years https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picosecond One nanosecond is to one second as one second is to 31.71 years. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanosecond

Thank you for your hard work! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.135.53.243 (talk) 16:16, 20 October 2015 (UTC)