Talk:National Defense Education Act

Law C‑class Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Education

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled[edit]

Looks like text was taken from http://www.bartleby.com/65/na/NatlDefe.html 69.47.185.144 19:29, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why does this article link at the top to nitrosamine? What has that got to do with this US Congressional legislation? HuronKing, September 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.233.86.217 (talk) 00:14, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

major edits 5-10-09[edit]

I edited this page based on a 1982 dissertation written on the subject. For those with subscriptions, it is available through Proquest dissertations.--Schwegles (talk) 01:08, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article gives too much weight to "affidavit disclaiming belief in the overthrow of the U.S. government." That is important, but I would like to see more on success measurements, any implications of long -term impacts, if any evaluations were attempted.

dladwigj 16 Jan 2010.

wording style[edit]

I feel that the article's subject matter should be explained more simply. The wording is a bit unnatural sounding. The sentences seem to be unnecessarily long. I'll take a stab at simplifying the article, while still capturing the original content. Michael Powerhouse (talk) 21:26, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]