Talk:National Fire Protection Association

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Fire Service (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon National Fire Protection Association is part of WikiProject Fire Service, which collaborates on fire service-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Fire Protection
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fire Protection, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to fire protection equipment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

Suggested article move[edit]

Is there any reason this page should not be renamed (moved) to "National Fire Protection Association" to match the name of Google has many refs to "agency" but all of them I looked at are simply wrong (i.e., they also ref There is no indication on that it has ever had a different name. Lupinelawyer 22:29, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Posted note on article. Waited over a week. No dissent, moved page, fixed referring pages. Did not search for un-wikified refs. Lupinelawyer 20:32, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)

International? Really?[edit]

I dispute the fact that the NFPA is an international organisation. The only references I've ever seen to them are in relation to them being a USA only organisation. Furthermore in the UK the NFPA 704 'standard' is something I've never seen, whereas the United Nations Substance Identification codes sombined with the International ADR Kemler Code appear to be paneuropean.

You are right, only in the US Scott 15:17, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
Not really. According to your logic, if I've never read anything in Swahili, and we don't speak Swahili here, then I can dispute that it exists anywhere else. NFPA has members in over 100 countries and offices in several countries, including France and Australia. In 2001, NFPA's V.P. of Governmental Affairs said, "Most NFPA standards are already de facto international standards." For example, 21 fire and safety codes adopted in China. Just because some countries may adopt other standards has nothing to do with NFPA being an "international" organ. 18:55, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

Also, if you look at the history of the organization, you will see some of the original members were international. See

"Despite the term "National" in NFPA sometimes seeming to imply the lack of international involvement, the first overseas members joined the Association in 1903. They were John Smith of the Sun Insurance office in London, and George Smith from an insurance office in Sydney, Australia. They were soon followed by Nicolas Sergowsky, an insurance engineer in St. Petersburg, Russia, as well as a growing list of others who were awakening to the virtues of the organization."

And I believe they changed their name a couple fo years ago to NFPA International. Check their web site.
Pzavon 03:35, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Lots of italics[edit]

While quite informative, this is more than a little bit overwhelming. It strikes me as unnecessary to put in ALL of the details of membership, unless for some reason these are not available at It just makes this article a bit bulkier than it needs to be. A picture of the nfpa diamond would not be out of place, by the way.

Copyright violation[edit]

The article as it now stands isstood a few minutes ago was a clear (and long-standing!) cut'n'paste copyrigh tviolation from a document. Will try to revert to prior non-infringing form… DMacks (talk) 07:00, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Okay, I think we're clean now. DMacks (talk) 07:12, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Veeck Case[edit]

The whole section regarding "standards accepted as law" should be moved to the "Model_building_code" article, and referenced by this and other related articles. (talk) 07:09, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Founding member/s ?[edit]

So -- the organization was formed by a group of representatives, and yet only one person was a member? Was that a misprint, perhaps...? — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 22:46, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

List bloat[edit]

The "See also" section has recently been crammed with a list of red-links to non-existent articles about every NFPA standards document ever published. Is this really necessary? Why should Wikipedia undertake to duplicate content that is freely available from the Web site? I suggest the entire section should be deleted, since it is unnecessary bloat and adds little to understanding the prime focus of the article, the National Fire Protection Association. — QuicksilverT @ 04:34, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

{{OTRS pending [Ticket#2017021410019179]}}[edit]

Attempting to grant permission to use our copyrighted material in the page summary. Pending review by Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 20:06, 17 February 2017‎ (UTC)

As you can clearly read in the process there (as as someone who deals with formal code statements should understand), "pending" is not "accepted". And even if it were accepted, that does not make the content acceptable editorially, merely allowed by policy. You have a conflict of interest, so it's understandable that you seem to be eager to post your own company's version of material about itself and likewise that you are having difficulty seeing why we likely would not accept it. DMacks (talk) 21:16, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Permission has now been received for the content at (archived version) – please see above. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:33, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Conflict of interest[edit]

At least one major contributor to this article appears to have a close personal or professional connection to the topic, and thus to have a conflict of interest. Conflict-of-interest editors are strongly discouraged from editing the article directly, but are always welcome to propose changes on the talk page (i.e., here). You can attract the attention of other editors by putting {{request edit}} (exactly so, with the curly parentheses) at the beginning of your request, or by clicking the link on the lowest yellow notice above. Requests that are not supported by independent reliable sources are unlikely to be accepted.

Please also note that our Terms of Use state that "you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation." An editor who contributes as part of his or her paid employment is required to disclose that fact. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:29, 25 May 2017 (UTC)