Talk:National Institute of Disaster Management

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

I have rewritten the page. Kindly review it and tell if any problem persists. VIVEK RAI :  Friend?  06:13, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

It's much better, though the first couple sections still have quite close paraphrasing; try to avoid that sort of thing. I'm also not convinced that the organizational chart is tagged with the proper licence; where's your evidence for CC0? I don't know if it would qualify under fair use as it would be easy for you to produce your own non-infringing version. —Psychonaut (talk) 06:39, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
There are some facts and incidents which cannot be avoided. As for example, I cannot change the Disaster Management Act 2005 to Some act Passed in 2005. However, If you are not convinced, kindly try to give some edit on your own. May be your English might work better than mine because I sometimes get too emotional with it. As for the image, I think I should list it as copyrighted image with permission that it is too simple (simple text etc). That should work?VIVEK RAI :  Friend?  08:11, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
I think the re-written version is good enough to avoid copyvio so I've made that version live. Personally I couldn't see the close paraphrasing concern but maybe I was looking at the wrong source or something. Post here with more info if you want me to take another look. Dpmuk (talk) 18:56, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Obtained the permission to use the content.[edit]

I have obtained the permission from the Executive Director of NIDM as the proprietor of the content hosted on his website to use it on Wikipedia. I'm forwarding that copy to VIVEK RAI :  Friend?  05:17, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

I'm afraid permission to use the images on Wikipedia still won't be good enough to upload the images to Commons, which requires unrestricted licensing. See Commons:Commons:Licensing#Acceptable licenses and in particular the list headed "The following restrictions must not apply to the image or other media file". —Psychonaut (talk) 07:28, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
I know that. I wasn't talking about the Image rather the text. By the way, What about the re written page. Kindly change anything there to make it suitable and re host the article. VIVEK RAI :  Friend?  12:58, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
It is not sufficient for the copyright holder to grant permission to use the text on Wikipedia. He or she must irrevocably release the text under the terms of the CC-BY-SA 3.0 or GFDL licenses, or under one compatible with either, or into the public domain. This is because Wikipedia is not the only entity which publishes our text; anyone is free to take it and reproduce it. —Psychonaut (talk) 13:40, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! I have emailed the director with a template to release the text under the aforesaid licenses. Let's see what he has to say. By the time, you may wish to give me some review on the re written page. VIVEK RAI :  Friend?  15:13, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. —Darkwind (talk) 04:45, 29 December 2012 (UTC)