Talk:National Vaccine Information Center
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Please supply full citations when adding information, and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the National Vaccine Information Center article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|||
| Article policies
|
||
| Archives: 1 | |||
| This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Category[edit]
@SkepticalRaptor: I don't understand why you consider adding NVIC to the category "vaccination-related organizations" to be an anti-vax edit[1]. Antivaxers like NVIC are related to vaccination because they oppose it. Tornado chaser (talk) 00:32, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- NVIC are not scientists, they have no valid input into the vaccine debate, and they have chosen an Orwellian name in order to try to position themselves alongside reality-based organisations. Once again, your desire to show fairness to antivaxers does you credit, but once again, it goes too far here. Guy (Help!) 08:14, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- This edit was not about fairness, and I did not think that adding a group to the the category "vaccination-related organizations" gave them any legitimacy, it just means that the group has to do with vaccines, weather they promote bullshit about vaccines or science about vaccines. Tornado chaser (talk) 17:34, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- You have a bit of a reputation issue, in that most of your edits to vaccine related articles come across as sympathetic to antivaxers. I would support adding this article to Category:Child endangerment but it is already in the correct categories in relation to vaccines. Guy (Help!) 21:06, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- There are some other anti-vax groups in "vaccination-related organizations", should they be removed? Tornado chaser (talk) 00:41, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- You have a bit of a reputation issue, in that most of your edits to vaccine related articles come across as sympathetic to antivaxers. I would support adding this article to Category:Child endangerment but it is already in the correct categories in relation to vaccines. Guy (Help!) 21:06, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- This edit was not about fairness, and I did not think that adding a group to the the category "vaccination-related organizations" gave them any legitimacy, it just means that the group has to do with vaccines, weather they promote bullshit about vaccines or science about vaccines. Tornado chaser (talk) 17:34, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- C-Class organization articles
- Unknown-importance organization articles
- WikiProject Organizations articles
- C-Class medicine articles
- Low-importance medicine articles
- All WikiProject Medicine articles
- C-Class United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Low-importance United States articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Unassessed Autism articles
- Low-importance Autism articles
- WikiProject Autism articles