|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
Article calls navayana:
Are either of these materialist? I can't speak much for the Dalit Buddhist movement, but I think Buddhism in the West is much more varied than that. Some Western Buddhists would see themselves as materialists, but many would not. And I think Western Buddhism and Dalit Buddhism are coming from very different places, motivated by very different concerns, yet this article just wants to identify them.
I think the idea of "navayana" is the claim to be a new vehicle, as opposed to Theravada/Mahayana/Vajrayana/etc. Some Dalit Buddhists claim this, some Western Buddhists claim this, but I don't think most Western Buddhists claim this, just some (don't know enough about Dalit Buddhism to comment). And even if people from both groups like the word, that doesn't mean they mean the same things by it, as this article suggests. --SJK (talk) 22:39, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- Propose deletion of this secularism-inclined article in that case since Dalit or Western Buddhists will have to call themselves Buddhas to officiate and create this new vehicle, which simply creates a newer schism or a questionable mental disorder that requires another subject matter expert. 22.214.171.124 (talk) 17:19, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
- I have removed your tags. The article is not a hoax. It is sourced. It is not illegitimate nor is it sectarian. A new branch of Buddhism certainly doesn't "create a questionable mental disorder" so please be more civil and be aware that "I don't like it" isn't valid deletion criteria. Dharmalion76 (talk) 20:49, 11 December 2015 (UTC)